Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts

May 21, 2010

O Me of Little Faith: True Confessions of a Spiritual Weakling by Jason Boyett

When this book came up for review I was excited to get the chance to read it. I'd never heard of the author and I'm not generally a reader of non-fiction, but lately I've become interested in the subject of apologetics.

I grew up in a Pentecostal Christian home. I never questioned any of what I was taught. I remember getting into a discussion my senior year of high school with a bewildered librarian who simply could not wrap her brain around my stalwart faith. I battled Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons, ripping their dogma apart and sending them home with with their own faith in tatters. I did always feel strange about things like speaking in tongues and being slain in the spirit. Having extensively studied the scriptures I knew that only some were to have such gifts (1 Corinthians 12:8-10), and it was clear there was a lot of play-acting going on. In my church I went against the flow, the lone solid stump below the swaying canopy of a windy forest. All that waving around and noise-making just felt wrong to me.

Then I started college, and that's where doubt really begin to set in, especially as my study of evolution coincided with my life-long pastor running off with the multi-million dollar church building fund. I wrote a bit about this time in my last review.

I can't really put my finger on any one thing that finally brought me back to the fold, but I didn't come back because my doubt had been dispelled; it never has been. So my attraction to apologetics is born of a desire to give credence to this way of life I've chosen.

I don't know why I always expect books to hold these huge answers for me. Books are written by people, not God, and people have puny little brains. Even the smartest of us can barely hope to do more than ask a really intelligent question, which inevitably leads to another question. No matter what science dreams up, there's never an absolute answer. Each question branches off into two or more new questions, and those questions get in a bitter argument over which question is more accurate. Blah! Yet I still expected Jason Boyett to answer my question of faith.

Instead, this book is an exploration of the question, which Boyett struggles with at least as much as I do. It is also a "coming out" of the question. In Christianity there's a lot of pressure to be perfect, and that means having perfect faith. Anyone admitting to less than that is either avoided or quarantined until he or she can be duly straightened out by pastoral counseling and a major laying-on-of-hands at the post-service altar call when everyone really just wants to get to Applebee's. So this was a very brave move for Boyett, especially as a respected writer in the Christian genre.

I respect that, and I'm glad I'm not alone. And I'm babbling on and on about myself because Boyett seemed interested in other tales of doubt, and he may read this and appreciate mine.

If you've read any of my reviews, you know I'm a bit of a Nazi when it comes to content, plot, organization, grammar, voice, and style. I probably go overboard in this area a lot of the time, but considering that getting a book published (by a real publisher) at all is akin to winning the Lotto, I think I have a right to be picky. Because somehow people that abuse sentence fragments and try to wrap two plots together that having nothing to do with one another keep getting in (*cough* Dan Brown *cough*).

Like I said, I'd never heard of Jason Boyett before this book was sent to me (free for the purpose of review, here is your requisite disclaimer). I wasn't halfway through the first page before I was struck by the thought that the book read like a blog. And the more I read, the more that thought stuck. This isn't really a compliment. In my opinion a blog has its place, and that place is on the InterWebs, not between the covers of a duly published book. Boyett's writing style is a strange combination between frat boy and scholar. His organizational strategy is just about non-existent. It seems as though he wrote this book the exact way I'm writing this completely unorganized review: by sitting down one day with a cup of coffee and just writing whatever popped into his head on the subject. It's not uninteresting, but it could have been done better. It should have been done better, the subject matter deserves it. We're talking about our eternal souls here, Jason!

When I finished the book I discovered that Boyett is indeed a blogger and has been for a few years. Having been there myself, I claim the right to be both sorry and snide. Or apologetic as the case may be.

If you are a Christian doubter yourself, or are outside the faith and curious as to how a doubter can remain a Christian, this book could be interesting for you. If you are short on time or have the attention span of a chipmunk, I suggest picking it up and just reading the last chapter. The last chapter says everything the rest of the book does, but seems to have been written with more forethought and weight than the preceding nine chapters.

I leave you with a quote from the last page of the book: "I'm a Christian, but I'm a big fat doubter. And I have to be honest: there are times -a growing number of times- when I'd rather be a doubter than have it all figured out."

And I also leave you with a question, which is how all things inevitably end. Why, Jason Boyett, does the little boy on the cover have band-aids on his nipples?

April 19, 2010

The Journey to Truth by George F. Garlick, Ph.D

Though each of us has a unique subjective perspective, the truth regarding questions of reality outside our control is not dependent upon what we believe. It's our goal to find and then form beliefs in and around the truth. - George F. Garlick Ph.D


I've recently become aware of and very interested in the subject of apologetics. If you're not familiar, this term does not refer to a group of people who feel remorseful, but to those who use science and philosophy to explain and defend a position. Specifically, this term currently applies to scientists, Christian and otherwise, who have stumbled upon proofs they wish to share with a world that on one hand demands it, and on the other hand completely rejects it without even looking at it.

And there is a lot of this proof. I am one of many who was raised in a Christian home by Christian parents who were afraid to even define the word "evolution" for me. As a result, when I went to college, I was completely bulldozed by professors who were more than happy to define it and use it to dismantle my faith. If my parents had given me vital information, I could have stood strong against this onslaught, but they didn't have it themselves and felt threatened by it. Now there are many, many books out there on the subject, notably those by Lee Strobel. I just finished reading The Case for a Creator by Strobel and it was incredible.

I thought The Journey to Truth would be basically an abbreviated version of The Case for a Creator, but while in the same vein, it offers a slightly different inoculation. The author, George F. Garlick (Ph.D), was a pioneer in the field of Holographic Ultrasound Technology, used in imaging. An intimate knowledge of the science involved and the study of physics gave him a unique perspective on the relationship between science and God. He chose to share these insights not out of a desire for fame, as he is well known as both a scientist and a philanthropist, nor for fortune, as all profits from the book are being donated to charities, but out of a genuine desire to enrich the lives of others.

I am so glad I was given the opportunity to read this book for review purposes, because it has absolutely given my rational brain a greater understanding of God in a way I never thought possible. We live in an empirical world, a world that demands evidence, and often even that isn't enough. Many Christians believe that those of us that crave such proofs are weak, that we ought to accept spiritual truths at face value. And they're probably right. On the other side there is the secular world, which has been given the mistaken impression that Christians are unintelligent because we're afraid of science.

Well Christians, there is no basis to this fear of science. If you seek, you will find, as I have, that science will actually bolster your faith to a degree you never thought possible. In fact, I think every Christian ought to read these books, I don't think it's possible to evangelize in this day and age without this vital information.

There are only two drawbacks to this book. The first is that the science is completely mind-bending, and while he tries, Garlick does not always do a very good job of making sense of it for the lay person. For example, when trying to explain the pre-creation state, he uses the example of an ice cube. When you heat it, it turns to water. Okay, I'm with you. Then gas. Still with you. Then an atom gas, then an ionized gas. Okay, got it. Then he says "Forces Unite With Strong" and then "All Forces Unite," without explaining what the heck that means. Lost me. The other drawback is that Garlick's abbreviated life story is mixed into the narrative. It's an interesting story, but it often seems totally random and distracts from the rest. If you aren't a science minded individual this will be difficult reading, but worth it. Even if you don't understand 100% of it, you will get the big picture, and that big picture is revolutionary and inspirational. If you're a book snob, the randomness will bother you at times, but you'll get past it.

Even with these drawbacks, I give this book five stars because of the enormous impact it has had on me, which overshadows everything else.

June 26, 2009

Sophie's World by Jostein Gaarder

I never took a philosophy class. In fact, I didn't really have much of an idea of what philosophy was. I basically thought a philosopher was someone who wore a toga and said cryptic things. I was mostly wrong.

Sophie's World is part novel, part history of philosophy. It's about a Norwegian teenager who begins a correspondence course on philosophy with a mysterious stranger. As their interaction progresses, she learns a lot about philosophy in a very short time, and is at the same time bewildered in changes she begins to see in the world around her. She receives postcards meant for a girl named Hilde, and these cards turn up in odd places. She finds clothing in her closet that doesn't belong to her. She meets Winnie the Pooh, Little Red Riding Hood, and several other literary characters. The more she learns and the more things she sees, she and her teacher have to wonder about the fabric of their world. What is its true nature? Who is Hilde? Are any of them even real? What is real?

This is a very trippy book. It can also be boring at times. I found the sections on the Greek philosophers fascinating, the ones about Darwin and Freud even more so, but the others I had a hard time wrapping my brain around. I still don't get Existentialism. I can't stand Albert Camus. It also explores the big questions: do we have a soul? What is a soul? Is there a God? An afterlife? Is time linear or cyclical? What are we made of? Is evolution and the Big Bang God's method of creation or a separate scientific path?

This would be a great book for anyone who is curious about philosophy. And now that I have a better understanding of the subject I really think more people would live fulfilling lives if they read up on it.

May 12, 2009

The Unbearable Lightness of Being by Milan Kundera

When I was a little girl, my brother shared an interesting mathematical conundrum with me. I was only four or five years old, but I've always remembered it. He stood in the hallway with me and pointed at our front door across the living room. He told me that if I tried to walk to the front door and walked half the distance needed to get there, then half again, then half again, I would end up getting very very close to the door but never all the way there. It was a model to demonstrate the infinite space between numbers.

As I grew older I learned that this model can be applied in other ways as well. There are some people that will walk right up to the front doors of their lives without hesitation, fling them open, and walk right on through into the sun. There are others who will only take the distance by halves, never quite reaching the door. Are they afraid of it, or are they simply too self involved? They concentrate so hard on the increasingly tiny steps they take that they don't even see the door anymore, only their feet.

Milan Kundera can't see the door, and he wants us to be as mesmerized by his tiny little steps as he is.

I'm not and never have been a student of philosophy, and this book has a lot to do with philosophy. Stupid philosophy. The book is about the idea that if something only happens once it is worthless and may as well not have happened at all (lightness). In contrast, something that happens repeatedly is heavy and important.

Excuse my French, but that is complete merde. I gave birth to my son once. I got married once. I only once kissed a secret love in a secret room and never saw him again. I only once shook hands for the last time with someone I loved. But those events are some of the most important things that have weighed on my life.

This book is full of completely stupid quotes like "happiness is the longing for repetition." Huh??? No, sorry. Kundera has obviously never been happy, or maybe he's never rolled hundreds of sets of silverware every night for five years. Happiness is an opening of the soul, not an endless tightening of bolts on an assembly line.

There are some very good quotes too, like this one that made me think of blogging: "Culture is perishing in overproduction, in an avalanche of words, in the madness of quantity." Amen to that.

The thing that really damned this book for me though was the stupidest argument I have ever come across against Creationism. Believe what you want, but please have a better explanation than this guy for it. Kundera writes that as a boy he saw an illustration of God in a children's Bible, which depicted Him as an old man in a cloud. Kundera saw that this depicted God had a mouth, and decided that if he has a mouth, he must eat, and if he eats, he must defecate. And God can't defecate because that would be unacceptably coarse, so therefore God could not have made us in His image, so Creationism cannot possibly be correct.

See what I mean? Half steps toward the door, never getting there. God did not draw that picture. An illustrator did. The illustrator created God in his image for the drawing. You cannot base a theological argument on something as groundless as a drawing. Beyond that, no one really knows what that "made in His image" bit really means. It could mean literal physical image, or it could refer to the fact that we have free will. In any case, he missed the part that God is omnipotent. If God wants to defecate, why shouldn't he? Our shame of our bodily functions is our own stigma, not God's.

The story. There really isn't one. There are a couple of situations that he uses to illustrate his ideas of weight and lightness.

The part of this book I did find good and interesting is a section in which Kundera demonstrates how different words mean different things to different people. The word "father" for me makes me feel warm and fuzzy because I have a good father, but for others the word will make them fearful or give them feelings of abandonment. He shows how when we are coming into adulthood we create motifs and symbols in our lives, and that we best create lives with others who share those motifs. When we get older we have a harder time forming relationships with others because the motifs they have created in their lives clash with ours and it's hard to build a relationship on uneven ground.

Overall this book struck me as a work of Emperor's New Clothes. Do I dare admit I didn't get it or thought it was stupid at the risk of looking like I'm stupid myself for not getting it? Yes. I dare. I don't claim to be anything other than a housewife who loves to read, so if you get this, please do explain.

So there was good, and there was bad, and there was really, really stupid. I don't recommend this book, but I give it three stars for quality of writing and the few good points he did make.

March 6, 2009

Villa Incognito by Tom Robbins


What i found in this book is that it was a whole lot of filler to tell a story that probably could have been told in about 50 pages. True to his style, Robbins does manage to throw in some good comedic points, and he truly is the master of the metaphor, but this time I didn't feel it was enough. I had read this book once before, and didn't like it much then either. I was hoping that this go-round I would enjoy it more, as it's been a good 5 or 6 years. No, sadly.

This is not one of Robbins' better novels. While I do enjoy most of his work, "Skinny Legs and All" being one of my favourite books of all time, this one is just didn't do it for me. Robbins jumps around from past to present, and after reading 4 or 5 pages of dialogue that doesn't seem to fit into the whole package of the book, I found myself wondering if he just didn't meet his required amount of words and was padding.

Would I recommend the work of Tom Robbins to another person, yes. Would I recommend this book? probably not. It just didn't captivate me the way "Another Roadside Attraction" or "Jitterbug Perfume" did. In fact, I found myself, many a night, almost forcing myself to continue reading it.

I give this 2 stars. Well written, just not entertaining.

February 6, 2009

Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal; A Novel by Christopher Moore

This is my first review for The Book Nook, and as it's my first review I am happy to be reviewing what just may be my favourite book of all time. It also happens to be the book I was reading when I decided to be a contributor to this great site.

This book is an irreverently witty and comical look at the lost years of Jesus Christ, what may have happened between the ages of twelve and thirty.

At the dawn of the new millennium, Christ's childhood friend Levi bar Alphaeus who is called Biff finds himself resurrected so that he may write his Gospel having the unique honour of being at side of the Messiah through the formative years.

This laugh-out-loud novel follows Biff and Joshua (as Biff points out in the novel, Jesus is a Greek translation of the name Yeshua, Joshua, and Christ is the Greek translation for the Hebrew word Messiah) as they grow from boys to men and travel East in search of the Three Wise Men so that Josh may learn how to become the Messiah to his people.

Moore is, happily, able to bring an endearing human quality to the man who was born of God, and juxtaposes him with his brash, cocky, and often lewd and vulgar best friend Biff. Together they study for years under the tutelage of the different Magi and learn from them in their own ways.

I have read this book six times, finishing the sixth time just this morning, and even though I know how the book will end (anyone knowing the plot of The Passion does) I still find myself on the edge of my proverbial seat as Moore takes us through the torture and trial of Christ through the eyes of his friends and apostles. As sarcastic and filled with tongue-in-cheek and clever irony as this book is, the spiritual and ethereal divinity is not lost. In fact, I find myself able to better empathize with the Biblical story, and coming from someone who is in no way religious, the basic teachings of being kind and loving thy neighbour as thyself are still easily identifiable.

I would highly recommend this book to anyone, regardless of their faith or creed, as there is a little bit in there for everyone. Please remember, though, that it is a work of fiction and beyond that, a comedy. It is not intended to change any one's beliefs or to challenge them in any way. And also, be forewarned that there is a great deal of language and sexual content within the covers of this book, sometimes tasteful, sometimes not (Oh Biff and his debauchery, not to worry Christ is ever Christlike).

This book is a Five Star book if I've ever read one. I hope you like it too.

June 27, 2008

Thief of Time by Terry Pratchett

I finished this book a few days ago but had to think about how I could write about it. I loved it from the very first page. It's funny, strange, deep, and complicated. It doesn't use elevated vocabulary, but it still requires slow methodical reading in order to grasp what is being said. And it's worth it.

This book is like Harry Potter for grown-ups. Not in the sense of wizardry, though there is a degree of that, but in the sense of this book and its subject matter being so completely new and yet so completely old and so well done that it's mesmerizing, and as soon as you finish it you want to read it again. It's like a mix between Kurt Vonnegut, Monty Python, Douglas Adams, Paulo Coelho, Ray Bradbury, James Bond, and the Bible.

As silly as this book seems at times, it tackles some very deep subjects in a way anyone can swallow. Like how we are connected to our bodies, how they ground us and inflate us at the same time. What time really is, how it works, whether it matters at all.

What would happen if Death had a granddaughter? If Time had a son? If it were possible to manipulate time with devices like prayer wheels and meditation? If the horsemen of the apocolypse rethought their lives? If the world could be saved with chocolate?

I LOVED this book. It is going on my top ten list, and that's saying a lot. In fact there aren't even ten books on my top ten list, I'm that picky.

April 30, 2008

The Translator

This book was either over my head or under it, I'm not sure which.

It's about a young college student in the early 1960's who befriends an exiled Soviet poet, who is also her professor. Her personal struggles, the Cuban missile crisis, a group of young American communists, and the poet all combined make her realize, extremely gradually, that the USA and the USSR aren't so very different after all.

I find it amazing that Kit simply decides to learn Russian and goes to a language school (which is somehow conveniently located biking distance from the poet's house- go figure!) for two months, and that the poet would accept this as qualification to translate his important poetry for him. Russian is a very difficult language, and poetry is very complex. The poet constantly explains the many ways in which true translation is nearly impossible, even for an expert, and yet he entrusts this task to an 18 year old college student with six weeks of language camp under her belt.

The author, John Crowley, tries to insinuate a romantic pull between Kit and the poet, but doesn't manage to pull it off. There's no chemistry or feeling between them at all that is noticeable to the reader until Crowley describes Kit or the poet making physical gestures to each other, which seem very out of place. On the other hand, the man she is actually dating never makes any physical or romantic advances, even when she spends the night with him in his bed.

After meandering in this way for nearly 300 pages, Crowley tries to strap everything together with bungee cords to make it all fit, but it just doesn't work. I get the impression of the Emperor's New Clothes here, a writer trying to seem deep without actually saying anything. The poetry wasn't even good, completely unremarkable.

The only things I found interesting about this book in the end were the nuances of the Russian language, some hints of conspiracy, and the comparisons between the USA and the USSR. That definitely made me think. And that two purported poets, lovers of language, use their words so sparingly that by the end they practically resort to sign language and occasional grunting to communicate. Otherwise, like I said, this book was either over my head or under it.

I would only recommend this book to a college student that wears black turtlenecks and kisses up to her professors because she hasn't enough intelligence with which to impress them.

April 19, 2008

Above All Earthly Pow'rs by David Wells

This is another one of the books I had to read for class that would be interesting to the general public. The full title of the book, Above All Earthly Pow'rs: Christ in a Postmodern World, gives a good picture of what David Wells is writiing. He is talking about how the Christian Church has been influenced by postmodernity and how it should relate to postmodernity.

Wells argues that the postmodern culture and Christianity are not compatible. In his own words, "The argument I have been developing in this book is that we should not make peace with postmodernity and that to do so carries the liability of losing Christian authenticity." (p. 248)

According to Wells, postmodernity says this world is meaningless, centerless, and spiritual (but not religious). As Americans, we want nothing to do with religion, but we want to dabble in whatever spiritualities make us feel good or simply sound right to us. There is no concept of something being true universally, as something that is true for you is not necessarily true for me.

The main influences that Wells believes got us to where we are today is the increasing immigration to our country which allows us to become familiar with other faiths as well as the rapid modernization which allows us to focus on the means and not on the message. He's not against immigration or technology but believes that they have brought about today's predominant American worldview.

One quote that I just had to share is when he talks about the growing anxiety of our culture. He defines anxiety as "living out the future over and over again before it actually reaches us" (p. 240). How true!

If you are interested in culture and Christianity, this is an excellent book to read. Wells is a great author that makes his subject interesting and academic at the same time.

February 25, 2008

Philosophy Made Slightly Less Difficult by DeWeese and Moreland


I know that my book posts have gotten a little boring lately, but sadly most of my reading right now is for class. I won't post about all the books I have to read, but I would like to post about those that might be interesting to the general population.

Philosophy Made Slightly Less Difficult: a Beginner's Guide to Life's Big Questions is a great introduction to philosophy. I've not had any formal training in the subject before this semester, so this has been a great way to start to grasp some of the basic concepts.

I would only recommend this book to someone who has a strong interest in learning philosophy. It's not overly difficult (hence the title), but it isn't beach reading, either. Unlike the last book I wrote about, this book does read more like a textbook, albeit an interesting one.

Now that I've completely convinced you that you would never want to read this book, I want to encourage you to read the chapter "How Should Christians Think About Science?" if you have any interest in how Christians do/should view science. It opened up my eyes to several things that I had never considered before, as well as provided necessary support for views that I had previously held insubstantially.

As you probably realize, science by and large has rejected the Biblical accounts of creation and miracles and seeks to explain the universe apart from God. This clearly is a challenge that Christians must face, and the authors of this book assert that philosophy is the proper realm of this discussion.

February 21, 2008

Ideas Have Consequences by Richard Weaver


This a book I had to read for philosophy class, but is a very interesting book that many people could enjoy. I certainly did and am still thinking through many of the ideas of the book.

Richard Weaver is basically arguing that we reap what we sow idealogically. As we started denying the presence of absolute truths and rejecting discipline and hard work in pursuit of pleasure and comfort, the West has seen a decline in culture and order.

Weaver writes shortly after WWII which definitely influences his writing. Whatever optimism there might have been previously was shattered by the latest war which was the bloodiest and most barbaric known to man.

He talks about the decline of the hero, which is interesting considering popular opinion of the generation that he is writing about is that it was full of heros.

One part that I value in Weaver is his discussion of education. Because me assume that "facts" and "truth" are the same thing when they are really different, our education today centers around acquiring facts rather than learning truth. "The acquisition of unrelated details becaomes an end in itself and takse the place of the true ideal of education....The supposition that facts will speak for themselves is of course another abdication of intellect"(58).

I recommend this book for anyone who is up for a challenge and is interested in the decline of culture.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...