Showing posts with label Jane Austen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jane Austen. Show all posts

February 27, 2012

Austenland by Shannon Hale

I'm always a bit irked when I sit down -knuckles cracked, coffee poured- to write a review on some marvelous book I discovered only to find I'm late to the game and it's already been made into a major motion picture. At least this one hasn't been released yet, but still. Humph.

Austenland is the story of a young woman (33, which is younger than me, and therefore qualified as young) who, like many of us, is a HUGE Jane Austen fan dreaming of one day meeting her Mr. Darcy. This idea of perfect romance has become so entrenched in her that she can no longer even attempt a relationship with an actual man. An elderly relative understands this about her, and leaves her a vacation to Austenland in her will.

Austenland is a (presumably) fictional place where we pathetic Regency wannabes of means can do what we've always fantasized and immerse ourselves in Austen's world for whatever duration that can be afforded. Visitors are issued a Regency wardrobe complete with corset and bloomers, and are tended by a maid to dress them and arrange their hair. Their electronics are confiscated and replaced with embroidery hoops, and a new identity is created for them so they can fully immerse themselves in a world of pretend, populated by actors paid to be equivalent Darcys and Bingleys and Wickhams to palpitate the guests' desperate hearts.

Jane Hayes doesn't want to go, but decides it may be her last chance to get Mr. Darcy out of her system so that she may finally function in the real world as a fully operational adult. She goes through phases of resistance and withdrawal, finally resolving to truly act the part and make the most of the ridiculous scenario she finds herself in. Along the way she must mingle with middle-aged women pretending to be twenty, a handsy "uncle," a trio of top-hatted suitors, and a gardener who appears to be just as bewildered by the whole thing as she is. By the end, the question is no longer whether she can shake Mr. Darcy, but who and what around her is real.

This is the most perfect bit of Jane Austen fan fiction I've come across. The reader is no longer separated from Austen's imagination by overzealous writers flinging semi-colons and pretentious words around like Jackson Pollock. Jane Hayes is the literary incarnation of the reader, and Hale writes with a true sense of herself and the fact that she is not Jane Austen but nonetheless a very talented writer who would never say "nonetheless." Hale's wit rivals Austen's own, but in a 21st century sense.

Looking over the cast for the film on imdb, I think they've done a halfway job of rounding out my imaginings. Felicity -oops, I mean Keri Russell- is Jane Hayes and Jennifer Coolidge is the ridiculous Miss Charming, those two are perfect. But their choice for Mrs. Wattlesbrook, who I saw as a rotund jowly creature is Jane Seymour? And Mr. Nobley, the Mr. Darcy character, is someone I've never heard of with ears that look like they could pick up signals for SETI. Humph again. Well, maybe he's better in motion.

post signature

February 5, 2012

The Silver Locket by Margaret James

Rose is the daughter of a rich gentleman. Michael is the son of a rich family. And Alex is the illegitimate son of a harlot. An interesting love triangle to say the least. Now add in World War I, Jane Austen like arranged marriages, and a lot of strange characters and you have The Silver Locket.

Rose's family wants her to marry Michael, a handsome man who is a good match, but Rose wants to do something else with her life. So she runs away, lies to become a military nurse, and meets all sorts of characters while finding her true place in life. Alex joins the army to forget about Rose, the girl he's loved from afar since he was 12. And in forgetting about Rose, he distracts himself with another woman Chloe who he eventually marries out of obligation, not love. And Michael joins the army out of obligation, hates Alex, and continually tries to convince Rose to marry him to gain her father's inheritance.

I'm not going to give away anything else but will say that as much as I wanted to, I didn't really like this book. I finished it because I have a habit of finishing books and I had to for the purpose of this review. But there wasn't a single character that I actually liked other than maybe Maria who was only in about 5% of the book. I felt like they all had major flaws that were infuriating to me, and they all criticized and judged each other when they were doing the same things, just in a different form. One example that killed me was that Rose thought Michael was a terrible person because he abandoned his own child, but Alex abandoned his wife and child but she didn't seem to care. I did however, like the fact that Rose broke from the mold of her society and ran away to do her own thing rather than being forced into a marriage she didn't want.

I also felt like the story just kept dragging on and on without any new developments. The same story that started in England moved to France and then to Russia. Rose worked a nurse, Alex and Michael fought, and they all worried about each other getting hurt. And it just kept going when in reality the same storyline could have been played out in half the pages. This book may be for some people but it wasn't for me. 2 stars.
post signature

November 12, 2011

Persuade Me by Juliet Archer

Juliet Archer has recreated Jane Austen’s classic novels in her “Darcy & Friends” series. While I have not had the pleasure of reading the other book in this series, Archer instantly hooked me after the first few chapters in “Persuade Me,” the second book in the sequence. Based on Austen’s “Persuasion,” Archer recreates the scenes of Bath, Lyme Regis, and the luxurious Kellynch estate, while transforming the central characters into relatable individuals in today’s age.

The novel revolves around Anna Elliot, a Russian Literature professor, and her past lover, Rick Wentworth. After falling madly in love in France, Anna’s wealthy family forces her to sever ties with Rick after deeming his simple beginnings as unfit for a woman from the Kellynch estate. Years later, after publishing a bestseller book on the sexual activities of marine animals and pursuing a seven-week book tour, Rick reenters Anna’s life with one purpose: to put the past behind him. Armed with moderate wealth, swooning fans, and a supermodel girlfriend, Rick wants to show Anna how much she gave up all those years ago. However, as the two characters meet for the first time in ten years, things become complicated. Between Anna’s sisters-in-law vying for Rick’s attention, the mysterious masseuse Cléopatra Clé warming up to Anna’s wealthy father, and her sister’s, Mona, complicated marriage, Archer keeps the reader guessing what will happen next.

Even if you are not familiar with Jane Austen’s “Persuasion,” Archer draws the reader into her world of undying love and family issues. The book presents the viewpoints of both Rick and Anna, allowing the reader to delve into the psyches of both characters and discovering how simple misunderstandings lead to humorous and entertaining plot turns. I found this novel impossible to put down and highly recommend it to any reader who enjoys the complexity of Jane Austen’s novels or just wants a good romance novel to curl up with. I will certainly be on the lookout for Archer’s next novel and wondering which characters she will chose next to introduce to the twenty-first century.

Four and a half stars.

post signature

June 3, 2011

Girl in the Gatehouse by Julie Klassen

Banished from the only home she's even known, Mariah Aubrey hides herself away in an abandoned gatehouse on a distant relative's estate. When Captain Matthew Bryan leases the estate to impress a girl, he has no idea what's in store for and neither did I.

Girl in the Gatehouse is a series of fun twists and turns as Mariah gets settled into her surroundings and tries to make the best of life in the gatehouse. She takes the time to work on her writing, plan theatrical performances for the orphanage next door, and rescue crazy ship captains from bondage. While the novel dwells on her past to give the reader a background of what happened to send her to the gatehouse, it really focuses on her life now and moving forward from her mishap. 

The author, Julie Klassen, was inspired by Jane Austen, and it shows in her writing. Unlikely romance, dashing adventure, big parties, and mysterious and comedic side characters that each have their own stories to tell all wrapped up into a story that really boils down to the relationship between a boy and a girl. I loved all of her characters and how she gave the reader a glimpse into each of their lives without taking away from the main plot too much. And I also loved how even though seemingly unrelated, she tied all of their stories together in a way that actually worked. One of the best parts about the book was going on the same journey as the characters as they step by step learned how they were all intertwined somehow. I've never read anything else by Julie Klassen but if given the opportunity would love to pick up another one of her novels.

**I received a free copy of this book for review purposes from Bethany House Publishers. 


May 31, 2011

Jane Fairfax by Joan Aiken

I love that there is so much Jane Austen fan fiction, and I love that Austen's fans are respectful enough to attempt to emulate her- or if they're humble enough to know they aren't capable of that, to simply be inspired by her in their own endeavors. Some have done it well, others really ought to pack it in.

One of the things I like most about Jane Austen is that there are no anonymous Red-Shirts in her books. Even the most fleeting of supporting characters hint at great stories untold, entire life stories somehow conveyed in the flick of a fan or the swish of a skirt. One of the most intriguing of these for me is Jane Fairfax, the heroine's unwitting rival in Emma. Jane's life was barely penciled in, but enough information was there to make me curious. I always wished Austen had done a separate book for Fairfax. But as she is currently rolling around in her grave in response to horrors like this, Joan Aiken bravely took on the challenge.

Jane Fairfax is an orphan who lives sometimes with her grandmother and spinster aunt, and sometimes with wealthier friends of her family who took her on as a companion for their daughter. She is seen as a charity case, living largely off of Emma Woodhouse's family. She is also loved and admired for her beauty, natural elegance, and musical talent. As she travels with her plain, timid companion, Rachel, she is constantly in the difficult position of putting Rachel forward, trying to place herself in the shadows, as she cannot go on with her own life until Rachel is married. This situation is compounded by rumors of non-existent dowries, which have suitors throwing themselves at her feet, and she must continually turn them back toward Rachel. This becomes especially difficult when she finally falls in love with one of these suitors, who does marry Rachel in the end, leaving Jane heartbroken. Frank Churchill is there to mend her heart, and though she's unsure of her feelings, Jane agrees to a secret engagement, essential for Frank's potential inheritance. In order to throw gossips off the scent Frank pretends to court Emma, making life even more difficult for Jane as she continues to struggle with her feelings for her lost love and must face Emma's visits and snide remarks.

I haven't read Emma in awhile, but I feel Aiken did an excellent job staying true to that story and all the events and characters therein. Her writing is not identical to Austen's, but it's a good try. While Austen's writing is a perfect balance of lightness and language, Aiken's is heavy. She does an excellent job building on Austen's characters without turning them into caricatures. The only problem with this is that when thrown into a bright light, a lesser character is often shown to be exactly that after all. In Emma, Frank was sexy and unreliable. In Jane Fairfax, he somehow became a golden retriever, the sexiness a ruse to distract Emma and other gossips. Golden retrievers are great dogs, but you wouldn't want to marry one. Also, for a romance to be good, the heroine can really only ever truly love one man, and Aiken couldn't quite conquer that obstacle, so Jane's romance with Frank just doesn't satiate the reader. He comes out as quite the second banana, albeit the second banana who got the girl. Jane, however, was done perfectly.

Aiken has another book called Mansfield Revisited. My mom just read it and tells me the hero of that story turns out much like Frank Churchill. That's a disappointment, but not enough of one to keep me from revisiting some of my favorite characters.

March 4, 2010

Mr. Darcy Broke My Heart by Beth Pattillo

I bought this book for my mom in anticipation of Mother's Day, and then I very carefully read it, barely cracked open so as not to damage the spine. I have to admire any writers willing to tackle anything related to Jane Austen. Few writers have as dedicated a fan base as Austen, and those fans are purists. Don't mess with my Jane! You think you can write like her? Psh. Go ahead and try. Remember this one?

Patillo is more clever. She knows she can't write like Austen, but she needs Austen's voice for this story. The solution is a long lost manuscript by a very young immature Jane Austen who had not yet developed the voice her fans are familiar with today. This manuscript is still not quite up to par in my opinion, but I have to concede that Pattillo had the dual challenge of trying to fit said manuscript into her own novel without turning it into a doorstopper. Note to Ms. Pattillo: I love doorstoppers! But I understand, your editor probably doesn't.

Mr. Darcy Broke My Heart is the story of a 30 year old woman who is familiar with Austen but not obsessed, and finds herself attending a seminar on Austen at Oxford to present a paper on her sister's behalf. She is at a crossroads in her life: with a boyfriend who barely looks at her, a job loss, a lack of education, and a little sister that doesn't need her anymore. She's hoping to use the week in Oxford to sort out the rest of her life. But two new acquaintances make this difficult. Harriet, the local eccentric, who has been hiding Austen's forgotten manuscript, and a dreamboat Mr. Darcy clone who seems oddly infatuated with her.

I think this book could have been better. In fact it may have been better, I can just imagine Pattillo being told over and over to cut and cut and cut some more! She had a lot to cram into only 250 pages. If it wasn't for that, I think the book could have had a lot more body to it, the kind of body that made Jane Austen's books so great. Instead she has to constantly throw her characters into each others' paths and rush things along at the speed of light. I think this happens a lot with Austen fan books. I wish the agents / publishers / editors / writers would realize that we Austen fans love the intricacy of her writing, the details and minutiae exquisitely penned with delicious fat words. Instead they always turn it into something light and fluffy at the sixth grade reading level.

Also the seminar the main character attends has only 6 people? I've never been to an Austen seminar at Oxford, but I'd think there'd be several hundred at least.

However, I really loved what Pattillo did with the Mr. Darcy phenomenon. Women LOVE Mr. Darcy. He really is the ultimate romantic hero. No real man can ever measure up. And so Pattillo's character learns. The Mr. Darcy clone makes her head spin, but she comes to realize than spinning can make you dizzy and dizziness is not conducive to the kind of changes she needs to make in her life. It's long been a theory of mine that romantic novels give women unrealistic expectation in their own lives, making relationships difficult. We have a standard that no man can live up to (thanks a lot Jane!), which causes us to be disappointed with our mates at every turn. I think Pattillo does a great job of addressing this issue.

I recommend this book for any Austen fan looking for a light read and will look for her previous novel, Jane Austen Ruined My Life.

July 6, 2009

Jane and the Barque of Frailty by Stephanie Barron

Oy. Where to begin?


The General Idea

Brace yourself, Jane Austen fans. Do you remember that old Angela Lansbury show Murder She Wrote? Well, replace Angela Lansbury with Jane Austen. No, I'm not kidding. This is a whole series too. I'm not at all one for murder mysteries, but my mom wanted me to read this, as we are both Austen fans, so I basically read it out of obligation. In this installment, Jane Austen attempts to solve the murder of a Russian princess.

The Good

Let's see. The good. Well, Barron has a genuine writing talent (which she unfortunately consults far less than her thesaurus) and definitely did her historical research. There were also editorial notes to explain bits of history or language.

The Bad

(In which I attempt not to take the Lord's name in vain) Sweet mother of... of.... of all that is literary and... um... whatever (This is starting to read like an Avril Lavine song). There ought to be a law against this sort of thing. I mean, Jane Austen was a real person. A real person with a huge international fan base even now, a genuine literary icon, who basically invented the ideal heartthrob. It should not be allowed for someone to take this real woman's life and turn it into a Wednesday night whodunit. Making matters worse, my mom told me (and if my mom told me it must be true!) that Barron is actually related to Austen, which in my book gives her even greater accountability. That is my first objection.

I do not see the Jane Austen of my heart in this book, I see Angela Lansbury in period costume. In fact, I think Jane Austen would be horrified at this representation. Jane Austen dressing up as a hooker? Jane Austen telling lies harmful to her own reputation to a jeweler in order to protect a woman of dubious reputation that she doesn't even like? Jane Austen attempting to solve mysteries that have nothing to do with her based on the most circumstantial evidence you can possibly imagine? Don't worry Jane, I've got your back!

My second complaint is that Barron seems to rank among those writers that need to step away from the thesaurus, and Wikipedia. In her case she needs to step away from whatever historical linguistic references she uses. Let me give you an example. In an editorial note she lists the common phrases used in Jane Austen's time for "mistress." These include "barque of frailty," (with no explanation as to what the heck a barque or a frailty might be), "snug armful," "muslin company," "Cyprian,"and more. Every time her characters refer to these women, they must use a different term. It's like Barron is afraid to be repetitive, so instead she gives us the linguistic sampler package. It hurts to read. It's embarrassing. Here is an example of my own, because a baby is sleeping on me at the moment and I can't reach the book. "For a Cyprian, you'd think she'd spend more time with the rest of the Muslin Company. Who can a Snug Armful turn to for friendship if not another Barque of Frailty?"

Then there's the excessive use of punctuation. Yes, I know how to use a semi-colon, and I'm going to prove it by using as many of them as I can possibly manage in a single sentence! And, I also, just love to, use, so very many commas, as to appear, as historically correct, as possible, because you know, those Englishers, back then, just loved, their punctuation!

The Ugly

And perhaps worst of all, depending on your priorities, she doesn't even solve the crime! She pulls that old Murder She Wrote trick of just assembling everyone involved in a room and pretending you know who did it to get them to spill the beans. The inspector hides behind a curtain, the amateur detective behind another. I kid you not, she really did this, curtains and all. And her characters confess to all manner of things, except the friggin' murder! What kind of murder mystery is this anyway? You never find out who really killed the princess, you just get a general idea of what led up to the murder.

Also in one scene Austen's sister-in-law is bashed in the head with a cobblestone and a mysterious woman is seen running away. But you never find out who did this or why.

Fear not, I have solved the mystery. Barron herself, so confused about her own plot and overwhelmed by an excess of characters, herself stepped into the book, rented a hackney, and bashed Eliza in the head. Thus she was able to lay Eliza up in her bed for several days of plot, safely out of the way, so Barron could navigate her Lansbury Austen through the streets of London less encumbered.

Avoid!

April 1, 2009

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith


The Pride and Prejudice we all know has been re-imagined. England is over run with brain lusting Zombies. Elizabeth and her sisters are trained and practiced in the deadly art of Zombie slaying. Elizabeth’s best friend has been stricken with the “strange plague”. And a true gentleman beheads the Zombies for his lady, so that she will not soil her dress.

Without offending die hard Jane Austen fans, maybe Pride and Prejudice should have always had a Zombie element. The Zombies contrast our characters so nicely that they manage to make the sarcasm funnier, the villains more disgusting, and the story even more dramatic. It’s like classic literature in high definition. For instance, when propping Lydia, Mrs. Bennett or Wickham next to hordes of Zombies, the reader does briefly wonder who is viler.

Seth Grahame-Smith’s ingenious idea for a lethal mix of classic Austen text with Zombie references and battles spawns pure entertainment. This re-telling is obviously deliciously over the top. Here’s a taste: “But the presence of a woman who had slain ninety dreadfuls with nothing more than a rain soaked envelope was an intimidating prospect indeed”. And my favorite quote, “Elizabeth and Darcy happened upon a herd of unmentionables…crawling on their hands and knees, biting into ripe heads of cauliflower, which they had mistaken for stray brains”. This edition also contains illustrations detailing the action and adding to its charming ludicrousness.

I plan on gifting this to everyone. What a sneaky way to get my teenage brother to appreciate some classic literature. Literary types and Zombie lovers alike should appreciate the spirit of this reinvention, if they don’t relish every word. I have never read anything like it, so I’m officially begging for a series of classic literature injected with Zombie mayhem.

I'm also offering a brand new copy to one lucky reader. Please leave a comment by April 11th (with a distinguishable email) to be entered.

April 23, 2008

Jane Austen Book Club

I only just discovered, as I was looking for an image for this post, that this book has been made into a movie. Blargh, hate it when that happens!

I've walked past this book at the library many times. I didn't pick it up because my experiences with books about book clubs have not been good. They're generally sappy and full of stereotypes. But I was in a bit of a hurry so I grabbed it.

This is a great book for a Jane Austen fan, and I am a Jane Austen fan. I own the collected works and have read them repeatedly. In each chapter the club discusses a different Jane Austen book, and each member has their own likes or dislikes regarding Austen or literature or life in general that colors their perception of the book. There is also a synopsis of each Austen book at the end so you can refresh your memory.

The story itself would not be so great if it were not so well written. And it is very well written indeed. Here are some of my favorite quotes.

"In the cottony peace outside we heard the stream rinsing and spitting."

"After everyone had gone and there was no one to see, Sahara would be given the plates to lick, but this was a secret and Sahara could keep a secret."

"We thought how it was time for Allegra to be getting over Corinne. We thought how hard Sylvia was working to get over Daniel. We thought Allegra could learn something from that. Birdshit landed with a plop on the edge of the porch."

This was a good book, but I don't understand why it's being made into a movie, as it's greatness is entirely due to the way it is written. I don't see that coming across in a film at all. As a film it will just be another chick flick, another YaYa Sisterhood or How to Make an American Quilt, something with lots of flashbacks and and lots of breaking up and making up between characters learning to understand one another. Jane Austen cannot possibly be heard in such a film either.

So I do recommend this book, but I will definitely not be seeing the movie.

Edited to add: My favorite scene in this books takes place at a fundraiser some members of the book club attend. They are seated at a table with a fairly popular but formulaic mystery writer, and quickly turn against him when he confesses to never having read Austen because "I don't read much women's stuff. I like a good plot." They shut him out of the conversation and one of their group tells them all a story of one of her ex-husbands. A few months later the mystery writer releases a new book with a story mysteriously similar to the one told at the fundraiser. There are actually several instances in this book of writers stealing the true-life stories of others for plot material. It was an interesting and amusing look at the writing world.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...